Display MoreExcept for a link to pre-installed micro SD cards on the Pi downloads page (which exists solely to stop people asking where to get them, and earns the project about £40/year in affiliate income) and a donation of some hosting credit from DigitalOcean, this project is entirely funded through end-user donations and deliberately has no commercial sponsors. None. The project has clearly stated non-profit objectives and since inception we have refused commercial partnerships to ensure the project remains free from those influences - a lesson learned from OE.
In the near future our approach to sponsors need to change. Why? .. because to increase the amount of Amlogic (and Rockchip, and eventually Allwinner) hardware that we publish images for, our hosting and currently very limited jenkins/continuous-integration infrastructure needs to expand. This costs real-world $$$ and the current annual levels of user-donations will not cover the projected expenses. We also need to plan and adapt the code of our build-system to permit greater levels of automation and test. It's really a HUGE and grown-up effort for the project, and it requires contributors to step-up and do some boring stuff for the general good instead of focussing on personal interests like hardware-hacking their latest device. We would also like to send people to FOSS events like FOSDEM and Embedded Linux Conference; to represent the project and meet the community peers who we collaborate with and have the "over a beer" conversations that result in relationships that help to move the project forwards. None of that is for free, and since money is involved there needs to be people who manage the money and people who have oversight to ensure responsible governance and avoid misuse. You perceive that to be 'corporate' behaviour. We (in particular those who come from OE which had zero transparency on these things) see it as simple common sense.
Our goal is (always has been, and will remain) to support much more hardware. However, aside from the functional things mentioned above which are holding that goal back, we also need to consider our name/reputation and that of Kodi and the rules of their trademark. We choose not to endorse and promote manufacturers who wallpaper our forum with advertorial postings for their products. We choose not to work with Android box vendors who ship "fully loaded" piracy devices that harm Kodi. We choose not to work with cheap manufacturers who provide terrible support for low-quality hardware and expect us to provide free support and software in return for a couple of samples and the opportunity to put their logo on our download page. In fact many of our contributors purchase their own hardware (or allow the project to buy) to avoid feeling beholden to a manufacturer because they accepted something for free. This position does sadly narrow the options on who to work with a bit, and the approach where we have bona-fide vendors like WeTek/HK having 'official' releases causes a problem because everyone else wants to be official too. This has to change in the near future (we completely agree on this!) but how that change happens is something to be discussed. How it is done will not be my or any other one persons decision. It will be a team decision. The first of many internal discussions to talk about some of these topics takes place tonight. However it's a complex topic, and a revision of our approach requires consensus. It will not be a quick process.
We have repeatedly tried to explain some of this to you, but you have repeatedly refused to believe or even listen to the explanations given. In the literal sense of the word you are unreasonable, i.e. "someone who cannot be reasoned with" and your views appear to be immovable. This inability to acknowledge actual facts or the general consensus view of basically everyone else in the wider team, many of whom have been contributing to LE (and OE before) for years not just a couple of months, is why people are increasingly tired and less accepting of your demands.
For the record, we know our audience. Your personal perception of Raspberry Pi being irrelevant to the future is not shared by the wider team or the 150,000+ existing LE pi users, and the future of LE (and Kodi on Linux overall) is very ARM based. We are proud of the contribution we make to the pi community and look forward to it continuing long into the future. There is also a considerable ongoing effort to solve some deep structural problems that have held Kodi-on-Linux back for a long time. LE contributors are leading this effort, and Amlogic (and Rockchip, and Allwinner, and Raspberry Pi) will benefit massively from the core architecture/performance work we are doing. However "Rome wasn't built in a day" and this will take patient months of collaborative effort. I place emphasis on the word patient.
I'm going to ask publicly that you rename the LibreELEC-AML github org to Community-LE or AML-Community or something else of your choosing that does not have LibreELEC as the main element of its name. Its appearance has caused some confusion with a couple of potential partners we are having tentative but positive conversations with. We have absolutely no issue with you running your own community development org. We do have an issue if that org portrays itself to be LE, or is easily confused for something official.
I will also publicly offer again, that If you would like to actually talk about things (Skype or similar) and resolve some of the misunderstandings that you have about how our project operates and the status-quo of certain things, you have my personal contact details and are welcome to reach out at any time.
I can't understand your (plural) continuous reluctance to support aml devices. It's obvious that the resources aren't the best, and the development presents tough problems to handle with. But there's a big audience behind theses crap boxes because their performance is FAR BETTER than the rPi3, for a cheaper price.
From outside, I've always perceived your attitude very hostile regarding all GDPR-2 's work. I'm sure that I can't understand almost anything that's behind the argument, but I know that losing a developer who has showed that huge commitment about this community project, is bad for everyone, not only for aml users.
