I just want to say thank you for your work.
I can play the BT.2020 movies with testing1 version with normal contrast and black level now even on my non HDR capable tv.
(My dc_cap is
420,8bit
444,10bit
444,8bit
422,10bit
422,8bit
rgb,10bit
rgb,8bit
)
I just want to say thank you for your work.
I can play the BT.2020 movies with testing1 version with normal contrast and black level now even on my non HDR capable tv.
(My dc_cap is
420,8bit
444,10bit
444,8bit
422,10bit
422,8bit
rgb,10bit
rgb,8bit
)
Done some testing, and the only problem i can see is that the famous frame skip is back for some media.
Also tested setting dc_cap to 444,12bit , and my AVR reports YCbCr444 36Bit and all 8/10 bit looks OK. Haven't tested any 12bit yet, so don't know if it works
... And the audio is also off by 0.125s
I am back and ready to continue testing...
I don't have the good cables yet, but I'll get them from the post room tomorrow.
So, I started to look for what I can in "8.0.2-testing1" first.
Observations:
- IR is not working, I thought it should? Or was that another build?
- 8bit is proper 8bit (regular start).
- Switch command to 10bit switches to 10bit.
- Frame skips:
--- Regular boot without command (8bit output mode): no skipped frames within 33 minutes, very promising! (Only two initial skips at video start.)
--- 10bit output mode: 29 minutes played, not a single skip so far - very promising! I will continue testing for a longer time later.
- I have not seen the "lower grayscale flicker" from the MM Krypton builds yet.
- 10bit videos look good in 8bit output mode, no hard banding lines.
Apart from IR not working and UHD testing pending, this seems to be a very good build.
Thank you very much johngalt.
Would you like me to continue testing this build or rather focus on "8.0.2-exp1"?
I don't see banding, but I do see some form of slim vertical stripes which I think are dithering artefacts. I had to walk up to the TV to see those, though
I see those artifacts as well ("8.0.2-testing1").
Display MoreI just want to say thank you for your work.
I can play the BT.2020 movies with testing1 version with normal contrast and black level now even on my non HDR capable tv.
(My dc_cap is
420,8bit
444,10bit
444,8bit
422,10bit
422,8bit
rgb,10bit
rgb,8bit
)
You're welcome! That dc_cap is interesting (no 10bit 4:2:0 support), what's your TV model?
Done some testing, and the only problem i can see is that the famous frame skip is back for some media.
Also tested setting dc_cap to 444,12bit , and my AVR reports YCbCr444 36Bit and all 8/10 bit looks OK. Haven't tested any 12bit yet, so don't know if it works
Interesting re: 12bit...I doubt it will be able to play 12bit media, but didn't consider 12bit output even working. What types of media are frame skips back on? AVC?
... And the audio is also off by 0.125s
What type of media is audio off on? Also, if you pause it and start it again, is the audio still off? I'll work on bringing in comparable changes to peak3d's I reverted which should fix this behavior.
Display MoreI am back and ready to continue testing...
I don't have the good cables yet, but I'll get them from the post room tomorrow.
So, I started to look for what I can in "8.0.2-testing1" first.Observations:
- IR is not working, I thought it should? Or was that another build?
- 8bit is proper 8bit (regular start).
- Switch command to 10bit switches to 10bit.- Frame skips:
--- Regular boot without command (8bit output mode): no skipped frames within 33 minutes, very promising! (Only two initial skips at video start.)
--- 10bit output mode: 29 minutes played, not a single skip so far - very promising! I will continue testing for a longer time later.
- I have not seen the "lower grayscale flicker" from the MM Krypton builds yet.
- 10bit videos look good in 8bit output mode, no hard banding lines.
Apart from IR not working and UHD testing pending, this seems to be a very good build.
Thank you very much johngalt.Would you like me to continue testing this build or rather focus on "8.0.2-exp1"?
IR should work if you update the device tree (place dtb without rename into .update folder as well) . Also, I'm interested if 4k output works for you on the current cables after a hdmi related change (fixed some 4K AVR compatibility).
I see those artifacts as well ("8.0.2-testing1").
They seem to be mostly eliminated in 8.0.2-exp1 :). All future work is going into 8.0.2-exp1 as well.
IR should work if you update the device tree (place dtb without rename into .update folder as well) .
Well, this is embarrassing - I completely missed that there is a new DT...
QuoteAlso, I'm interested if 4k output works for you on the current cables after a hdmi related change (fixed some 4K AVR compatibility).
Can you explain that change to me? It should not be possible (or advisory) to somehow limit the bandwidth, should it?
QuoteThey seem to be mostly eliminated in 8.0.2-exp1 :). All future work is going into 8.0.2-exp1 as well.
That sounds good - so we should focus on the new build?
I can start testing right away.
However, I am currently considering if I can use "testing1" as permanent replacement in the meantime, since I'm very annoyed be that flicker...
Is there any drawback compared to the old MM builds?
10bit output on capable hardware:
On a new boot before any other playback has been performed, run the following: echo '444,10bit' > /sys/class/amhdmitx/amhdmitx0/attrForce RGB:
If you have an older display and needed output_rgb, please use the following instead of the old interface:echo 'rgb,8bit' > /sys/class/amhdmitx/amhdmitx0/attr
I have a 8-years-old Panasonic plasma TV with the following display capabilities:
LibreELEC:~ # cat /sys/class/amhdmitx/amhdmitx0/dc_cap
444,10bit
444,8bit
422,10bit
422,8bit
rgb,10bit
rgb,8bit
Do I need to issue any of the commands I quoted above?
Display MoreI have a 8-years-old Panasonic plasma TV with the following display capabilities:
LibreELEC:~ # cat /sys/class/amhdmitx/amhdmitx0/dc_cap
444,10bit
444,8bit
422,10bit
422,8bit
rgb,10bit
rgb,8bitDo I need to issue any of the commands I quoted above?
I don't think dc_cap is reporting correctly for non-4:2:0 modes, but am not sure. If you'd like to try, you could run the first command and play a video to see if you get 10bit output. If you don't get output, reboot.
The rgb command is only needed if you previously had to enable output_rgb. I think the issue was a green tinted screen.
Can you explain that change to me? It should not be possible (or advisory) to somehow limit the bandwidth, should it?
It's actually not a bandwidth change, rather stops a hpll reset from occurring on timeout. I was surprised it worked, but it fixed the 4k nougat output issue for RedCat with a denon AVR.
However, I am currently considering if I can use "testing1" as permanent replacement in the meantime, since I'm very annoyed be that flicker...
Is there any drawback compared to the old MM builds?
"testing1" is in a very good state, with no drawbacks that I'm aware of.
I don't think dc_cap is reporting correctly for non-4:2:0 modes, but am not sure. If you'd like to try, you could run the first command and play a video to see if you get 10bit output. If you don't get output, reboot.
Video signal goes through my AVR, perhaps it affects dc_cap results. I'll try with direct connection to the TV when I get a chance.
Unfortunately, my AVR and TV are almost the same (old) age and they don't display any info beyond a simple resolution so I won't know whether I get 10bit output or not.
I ran the "echo '444,10bit'" command but I didn't see any noticeable difference in picture quality.
Video signal goes through my AVR, perhaps it affects dc_cap results. I'll try with direct connection to the TV when I get a chance.
Unfortunately, my AVR and TV are almost the same (old) age and they don't display any info beyond a simple resolution so I won't know whether I get 10bit output or not.
I ran the "echo '444,10bit'" command but I didn't see any noticeable difference in picture quality.
Okay, it's probably the AVR. I wouldn't worry about running either command then.
Somehow "exp1" turned out to be a mystery build. I'm not sure what I built it off. Whatever it is, it isn't built off the "nougat-exp" branches I pushed to github.
I've removed the build as such, and will continue working on it. Thank you everyone for testing. I highly recommend using "testing1" instead.
johngalt's,
is it possible to compile version for S912 devices too?
johngalt's,
is it possible to compile version for S912 devices too?
I don't have a S912 device, and additionally I'm not sure if any of these changes will have an effect on it because it uses libhybris and android blobs.
I don't have a S912 device, and additionally I'm not sure if any of these changes will have an effect on it because it uses libhybris and android blobs.
I hope it's possible
In any case thank you for your work.
May be kszaq can implement some of your achievements in our device builds
I surely will. When johngalt considers his work ready, I will start integrating all the improvements. Unfortunately I cannot add anything to it now as I have no HDR/4K/10-bit capable equipment.
johngalt S912 devices use libhybris only for OpenGL support/GUI rendering, everything playback related works the same way it does on S905(X) and additionally S912 is marketed as DV capable.
kszaq, Thank you, that's good to know. In that case, I can try a S912 build shortly.
Regarding merging "upstream:" I have experimental branches I'm working on. Once they're ready and merged in, we'll need testers who had 4k output issues on nougat (so far only one has reported the issue is fixed). After all that, we can address the merge :).
Uploaded another experimental build (check github release page linked as "download" in OP). This is built off the nougat-exp branches which have many amlogic updates merged in.