Hello
I have two old-ish devices which I am trying to assess the relative merits of:-
Compulab Fitlet-RM (AMD "Mullins" A10 Micro-6700T quad core APU nominal 1.2 GHz, 4 GB DDR3L-1333 RAM, Radeon R6 integrated graphics), circa 2014
Zotac PI225-GK (Intel Gemini Lake N4000 dual core SoC nominal 1.1 GHz, 4 GB DDR4L-1866 RAM, Intel UHD Graphics 600 integrated graphics), circa 2017
Both were designed for low power environments, are fanless and are specced to use less than 14 W under load.
I have tried booting up the latest version of LibreELEC 10.0 from a suitable micro SD card with each device connected to the same monitor.
The Zotac seems to struggle with the interface and most video playback. It's hard to describe, but it just seems "choppy", though with the debug mode on neither of the two cores is getting used above 20% and FPS averages 32.
The older Fitlet seems much happier as the interface moves fluidly and 1080p playback is perfect. I recall I used to have trouble with graphics support, but haven't used the device for a while so presumably the AMD driver was improved.
Neither is particularly good at 4K H.264 AVC playback, though I am only using a 1080p monitor.
I am particularly interested in working out if there are settings that I need to change to make the Zotac work better, because reading the forum there are indications that some of the devs have targeted Gemini Lake specifically.
Though the Zotac has the "cool" factor of being smaller than the average mobile phone, and can run off 5V USB power, I am under no illusions about its limitations, having spent a while trying to get a working Wayland desktop on it and not being particularly happy...
So that I understand my position, should the newer Intel-based device be faster for LibreELEC?