- Official Post
Ahh.. would be good to test then. Can you spin an image for the user?
Ahh.. would be good to test then. Can you spin an image for the user?
Sure. libreelec-rpi2.arm-9.0-set-bcdc-0.img.gz
This image should work out of the box then.
Hello,
I tested the new image you generated vpeter and unfortunately, there is the same issue
The verbose log file
We can see the ToS config taken into account here:
And the result of tcpdump : http://ix.io/1bvv
ToS is set well to 0x0.
Some ideas ?
chewitt: I will see the links you gave.
Yeah ! I didn't see your recent reply.
So I have to test the BCDC image ?
Yes pls.
So I have to test the BCDC image ?
That's second test.
Also try using ntpd_tos_00 I posted.
Strange that first didn't work even if tos is set to 0. Maybe your issue is different
Congratulations guys !!
It works with the bcdc image : Log file
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {del} route fe80:: gw :: scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {del} route ff00:: gw :: scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} address 192.168.0.19/24 label wlan0 family 2
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 192.168.0.0 gw 0.0.0.0 scope 253 <LINK>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 192.168.0.254 gw 0.0.0.0 scope 253 <LINK>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.27.40.240 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.27.40.241 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 0.0.0.0 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.227.81.55 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: ntp: adjust (jump): +20939080.231378 sec
Feb 19 20:36:39 LibreELEC nmbd[368]: [2019/02/19 20:36:39.527158, 0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:138(daemon_ready)
Feb 19 20:36:39 LibreELEC nmbd[368]: daemon_ready: STATUS=daemon 'nmbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections
Display More
What are the next steps:
Thank you for your support and your availability, it was a pleasure to work with you...
milhouse will pick that commit into his builds for some testing and as long as no issues are observed we'll add it into an update while reminding the Pi Foundation folks that the issue is still outstanding. The patch will probably miss LE 9.0.1 (which is due imminently) but land in LE 9.0.2. Keep using the modified test image for now; it's better to have a system that works with a few more unresolved Kodi bug than something with fewer bugs that doesn't work.
Ok chewitt.
I think I can close the discussion.
Thank you again to both of you.
I've been experiencing the same "connman attempting to use IPv6 NTP servers" issue while poking WireGuard support. I finally managed to track down one of the connman developers, which led to this chat:
[22:28:39] <wagi> IIRC, we try resolve the nameservers and when we get an IPv6 we try it. Don't know if we have some logic in place which checks if IPv6 is up
[22:31:04] <wagi> Indeed, we try IPv6 without checking if IPv6 is setup
[22:31:20] <wagi> So that explains the 'Time request for server' message
[22:31:44] <wagi> We should check if IPv6 is up and running before trying to send IPv6 frames :D
Fingers crossed there will a patch to test in the near future
I hope so too.
I try to find where is located the workaround provided by vpeter for my issue in the librelec repository and I don't find.
Could you indicate me where is the file(s) modified in the repo in order to check when this issue will be officially solved and when I can switch to an official version ?
In other words, how can I know if this issue is fixed ?
Thank you.
It is not fixed because this part is not (yet) included in LE.
Ok vpeter, but how can I check when this part will be included in LE?
How did you check that just now?
vpeter can you do an RPi image for these folks to test with this commit: TEMP: bump connman to HEAD to test ntp fix · chewitt/LibreELEC.tv@10982bd · GitHub
There are some connman changes in the last week which tweak the retry behaviour (it also impacts behaviour with WireGuard) and those changes may also resolve the issue. If it does fix I will get the connman folks to make a release so we can bump master/9.0.
can you do an RPi image for these folks to test with this commit: TEMP: bump connman to HEAD to test ntp fix · chewitt/LibreELEC.tv@10982bd · GitHub