Posts by vpeter


    But if I expand disk capacity after importing it works as expected




    When importing LibreELEC-Generic.x86_64-10.0.4.ova everything just works automatically without user intervention.


    I also noticed that importing on Vmware Workstation Pro 17 it doesn't fill the name of the virtual machine automatically like it does on older versions (compared only with v12).


    Size difference:

    I think storage partition has wrong size? Or is there some special install procedure for Virtual?

    I am on legacy....

    Yes, it doesn't install on that one.


    Code
    LibreELEC (official): 11.0.0 (Generic.x86_64)
    2023-03-06 12:18:15.611 T:882     debug <general>: CurlFile::Open - <https://addons.libreelec.tv/11.0.0/Generic/x86_64/driver.dvb.sundtek-mediatv/driver.dvb.sundtek-mediatv-11.0.0.0.zip>
    
    
    LibreELEC (official): 11.0.0 (Generic-legacy.x86_64)
    2023-03-06 12:14:46.492 T:978     error <general>: Requested path https://addons.libreelec.tv/11.0.0/Generic/x86_64/driver.dvb.sundtek-mediatv/driver.dvb.sundtek-mediatv-11.0.0.0.zip not found in known repository directories

    And I tried to explain the reason for this issue (tested myself). If you don't understand than I can't help more. When WOL feature is enabled and Kodi doesn't get ping response it will stall before playback start. When ping response is got it will play instantly. All this would be explained in the log which you don't provide. So happy using WOL disabled :)


    I don't know if this happens also with old releases because I didn't test them and I will not do it either.

    Just tested the addon on LE with connection from Windows and it is working as it should. I only set correct kodi password in addon settings and Windows Kodi instance got connected without a problem.


    So the addon still works as it was intended.

    Does it work connecting from terminal?


    Code
    mysql -u kodi -p -h 192.168.0.2


    I just thought the LibreELEC MariaDB addon looked like an easy install

    It was intended like this. And it worked in the past. But after all this time I have no idea about current status. Not much users I would say :)