Revert queue for le12. https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/9776
Le13 will need further work - due to depends for a revert (libfmt/c23) - so will look in to the fix / upstream issue
Revert queue for le12. https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/9776
Le13 will need further work - due to depends for a revert (libfmt/c23) - so will look in to the fix / upstream issue
I’m pretty sure if you do: ldd /storage/.kodi/addons/service.softcam.oscam/bin/oscam there will be a missing library. I have queued up the bugfix.
Please share systemctl status service.softcam.oscam.service
Please update to latest nightly. Likely glibc 2.41 dependency
Something before 23rd December - this is when ffmpeg was merged - https://github.com/LibreELEC/Libr…0e3ed829a1d+210 “Merge pull request #9569 from HiassofT/le13-ffmpeg-7”
Waiting on the upstream changes to be incorporated and a new version being shipped. https://github.com/xbmc/inputstream.ffmpegdirect/pull/304
In LE12 we moved the libraries to lib.private to keep them from colliding and cluttering the LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
nuc12:~ # find .kodi/addons/ | grep libfuse.so
.kodi/addons/virtual.system-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so
.kodi/addons/virtual.system-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so.2
.kodi/addons/virtual.system-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so.2.9.9
.kodi/addons/virtual.network-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so
.kodi/addons/virtual.network-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so.2
.kodi/addons/virtual.network-tools/lib.private/libfuse.so.2.9.9
the rpath has been updated on the binaries
nuc12:~ # ldd .kodi/addons/virtual.system-tools/bin/mtpfs
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007f34ba525000)
libfuse.so.2 => /storage/.kodi/addons/virtual.system-tools/bin/../lib.private/libfuse.so.2 (0x00007f34ba4e1000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f34ba2ec000)
libusb-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libusb-1.0.so.0 (0x00007f34ba2d7000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f34ba119000)
libudev.so.1 => /usr/lib/libudev.so.1 (0x00007f34ba0ca000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f34ba527000)
The code that does this is: https://github.com/LibreELEC/Libr…package.mk#L194
heitbaum 20230309 is older than 12.0.1 of 2024-10-17
Oops - didn’t read that.
dembala please try current LE12 nightlies. As if the issue is the same as the WebDAV issue, then the le12 nightly has the fix. https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/9178
These are at https://test.libreelec.tv/12.0/ (scroll to the end an use the latest 202412xx image.
Nightly 12 has the fix (after 12.0.1) RE: SFTP broken in LE12
I have looked at buildx a few times, there is a PR in my dev tree for it. It is a bit messy to build, and on my long term backlog.
27.4.0 is in the LE13 nightlies. 27.4.1 is in the backlog.
LE12 has 27.3.1 in it
rkershenbaum best shared the logs here now that kernel 6.12 is regressed from 6.6.x https://github.com/LibreELEC/Libr…ment-2455713147 to 6.12 https://github.com/LibreELEC/Libr…ment-2531602564
Addons PR updated to the latest - previous Jellyfin downloads have been removed from the Jellyfin download server.
2 errors
RPi5.aarch64 13.0 / build_image This request was automatically failed because there were no enabled runners online to process the request for more than 1 days. |
This request was automatically failed because there were no enabled runners online to process the request for more than 1 days. |
Not a bug as such, but simply they are not yet supported. Looking at the open tickets and the above seems to be getting to the bottom of the wireless issues reported, this is a good another “now known” item.
The list probably looks like the below now: (noting that these are shortcomings in drivers, kernels, supplicants, ….) The “But it should work” philosophy whilst idealistic is not true even in commercial / non iwd / non LE landscapes. Wireless will probably always have its challenges given standards and compatibility across the many elements that make it up - but every known reproducible issue should improves our support and hopefully the Linux wireless ecosystem system.
Known issues
Yes. Maybe. No.
Answer will depend.
In my case - I run nightly+ on my daily system (Generic ADL) , but am developing everyday as you would see. The operating system is starting to take shape for the LE13 release, in that the big changes - compilers, libraries, kernels are pretty much done. So no major changes at the operating system level that would impact are expected. We will be updating to the next Mesa soon.
As a developer, I run RC software packages, so that we try and address issues with “new packages” before they are released - thus I try to be on the front foot so that the commits are soak tested first. The team in both Kodi and LE do the same.
There are kodi changes happening (api) that will mandate changes/updates to addons, and this will continue through to the release of Kodi Piers. These may cause you to have to update - if you use these.
You will need to decide what’s best for you, but if you stay on a version “eg the early sept one” and don’t have fixed the issue you are trying to address, then when the LE13 does come out, the issue may still not be fixed in the release version. In the case of using “new hardware”, I would stay using recent nightlies, to make sure that they work with your system. Older hardware is usually more stable in the linux kernels/graphics software.
based on Chewitts answers - I would fix your system so that it can play all, as if there is another issue that comes, it might not get fixed. If there is a further problem that is not whitelist. So GUI in 1920x1080 and whitelist max 3840x2160.
Here is the log between those 2 versions
This is the only patch (that may be of issue) - https://github.com/LibreELEC/Libr…59e13377e8b3dc5
I can see a few things.
You are using the xe driver - good (as the kernel log indicates that 4908 is not supported properly by the i915 driver.)
The Kodi gui is 4096x2160 - suggest setting this back to HD
I believe from the logs that the GUI is working - please confirm
I believe from the logs the “bootsplash” is working - please confirm
From the playback logs, you can see that koi probably picks the wrong resolution for playback of the HD stream. Use the whitelist, get it to use a HD resolution.
The stream you are playing is broken - see ffmpeg logs.
Please test a known working file. E.g. 2D BBB - http://bbb3d.renderfarming.net/download.html
I am compiling a nightly image for you to test (current master + the 6.12-rc4 linux) download from https://heitbaum.libreelec.tv - will be there shortly.
vendor_id: 0x8086
device_id: 0x4908
make: 'SKYDATA S.P.A.' model:
2024-10-23 20:19:43.310 T:1685 info <general>: GL_VENDOR = Intel
2024-10-23 20:19:43.310 T:1685 info <general>: GL_RENDERER = Mesa Intel(R) Graphics (DG1)
2024-10-23 20:19:43.310 T:1685 info <general>: GL_VERSION = OpenGL ES 3.2 Mesa 24.2.3
2024-10-23 20:19:43.518 T:1685 info <general>: GUI format 4096x2160, Display 4096x2160 @ 60.000000 Hz
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 info <general>: Opening stream: 0 source: 256
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 info <general>: [WHITELIST] Searching the whitelist for: width: 1920, height: 1080, fps: 23.976, 3D: false
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Using the default whitelist because the user whitelist is empty
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Searching for an exact resolution with an exact refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] No match for an exact resolution with an exact refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Searching for an exact resolution with double the refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] No match for an exact resolution with double the refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Searching for an exact resolution with a 3:2 pulldown refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] No match for a resolution with a 3:2 pulldown refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Searching for a desktop resolution with an exact refresh rate
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 debug <general>: [WHITELIST] Matched a desktop resolution with an exact refresh rate 4096x2160 @ 23.976025 Hz (25)
2024-10-23 20:21:41.518 T:2450 info <general>: Display resolution ADJUST : 4096x2160 @ 23.976025 Hz (25) (weight: 0.000)
2024-10-23 20:21:41.547 T:1685 debug <general>: ------ Window Init (DialogBusy.xml) ------
2024-10-23 20:21:41.548 T:1685 debug <general>: OnLostDevice - notify display change event
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 info <general>: VideoPlayer: OnLostDisplay received
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 warning <general>: CDVDMessageQueue(audio)::Put MSGQ_NOT_INITIALIZED
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 warning <general>: CDVDMessageQueue(video)::Put MSGQ_NOT_INITIALIZED
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 debug <general>: Flush - flushing renderer
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 debug <general>: CDRMUtils::SetMode - found crtc mode: 4096x2160 @ 24 Hz
2024-10-23 20:21:41.752 T:1685 info <general>: GLES: Maximum texture width: 16384
2024-10-23 20:21:41.753 T:2450 info <general>: Creating video codec with codec id: 173
2024-10-23 20:21:41.753 T:2450 info <general>: CDVDVideoCodecFFmpeg::Open() Using codec: HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding)
2024-10-23 20:21:41.753 T:2450 debug <general>: CDVDVideoCodecFFmpeg - Updated codec: ff-hevc
2024-10-23 20:21:41.753 T:2450 debug <general>: CVideoPlayerVideo::OpenStream - open stream with codec id: 173
2024-10-23 20:21:47.792 T:2489 warning <general>: VAAPI::SupportsFilter image format not NV12
2024-10-23 20:21:47.800 T:2452 error <general>: ffmpeg[0xa79b200]: [hevc] Could not find ref with POC 0
2024-10-23 20:21:47.800 T:2452 error <general>: ffmpeg[0xa79b200]: [hevc] Could not find ref with POC 5
2024-10-23 20:21:47.800 T:2452 error <general>: ffmpeg[0xa79b200]: [hevc] Could not find ref with POC 9
Display More