Posts by escalade

    osen

    They work a bit differently, udevil is more like a mount helper. It's used in LibreELEC by udev when block devices are connected. You can point it to a block device, an iso file or a network share and it will create mount point and do the mounting for you.

    AutoFS on the other hand runs as a daemon and mounts on demand. It mounts an underlying filesystem on the mount point that detects what you're trying to access, then mounts it and unmounts after a set timeout. Very useful for network mounts that can be problematic if they become unavailable for whatever reason. When properly set up, it makes NFS/CIFS mounts feel like they are local.

    There's only one problem, AutoFS isn't part of LE. Not sure they would want it either as Kodi handles network mounts through libraries and it works fairly well. There's a bit of good news though, as I like having AutoFS available I've packaged it up in my fork. Perhaps you or someone else who takes an interest in it would look at making it an addon (shouldn't be much trouble) and upstreaming it. It compiles and runs great both on arm and x86.

    Uploaded new images:

    * Added back NFS kernel server (with v4 support), by default /storage/roms and /storage/media (mounted drives) are exported

    * AutoFS filesystem mounted at /media/Autofs (automatically mount NFS servers by accessing /media/Autofs/<hostname>)

    * The latest AVX2/AVX512 optimizations from Clear Linux

    * fba-libretro is now fbneo-libretro (update your /storage/.emulationstation/es_systems.cfg)

    "Private messages", that says it all doesn't it?

    So you managed to find someone that did the same ugly hack as I did months before me, great job. You're on to me Sherlock Holmes, this was all a great plot to make you look stupid, I have been planning it for years. That was the reason I described in detail how I came to my conclusion, wow how do you come up with this? Well, I'm not actually surprised.

    Sorry, but you managed perfectly well to make a joke out of yourself don't blame it on me. You keep repeating that you're tired of this whole thing, yet you come back with this "master plan"?

    Man, all this because you couldn't handle that I said "he copied my packages so they should function the same". The guy who basically did a cp -a packages/escalade/* /path/to/5schatten/ has got quite the ego. Even a monkey could copy my packages over to LE9 I spent literally 5 minutes on that. You realize that I started this on OpenELEC before this thread was even started right? I didn't have any prior artwork to look at for most of the things I added, I invested a lot of time in learning the toolchain and producing the things you take for granted and call your own. Not that nobody else could do it, by all means, but seriously GTFO with this false sense of ownership you have.

    It's doctor crazy, back again. You know, making up a lot of stuff doesn't actually make you right you know? For your information, ninja didn't exist in LE 8.2, I manually backported it and as a result I turned it off in packages that already compiled.

    Unlike you, I can actually use my brain and figure things out. The isystem sed is my original as you can see here: Problems cross compiling Dolphin for LibreELEC

    I found hints to the issue in the GCC bugtracker and experimented with the compiler command. This was copied by Lakka (which is mentioned when they added it) and yourself. Oh yeah, great thinking, of course I wouldn't be able to apply my own sed expression to flags.ninja instead of flags.make. You're a genius!!

    Get back to your version bumping and copying ok, and stop polluting my thread.

    Again, you're welcome for everything that's in your build.

    Just to clarify: I don't have a problem with anyone using my work niabi, this is open source. I couldn't care less if people include any license headers either, it's not like it's some special code. I have looked at a lot of your stuff as well you're doing plenty of cool things. The issue is this guy upstreaming stuff that I have provided him in messages without mention (look at other PR's, it's customary to say where you got it from if you didn't do it yourself), and then have the nerve to go on some rant here when I point out to a user that his build should function the same as it's based on mine. We're all using mainly RetroArch on LibreELEC no matter the frontend. He started out copying my packages, just like I did with Lakka years back. It's not the first time he's starting a public pissing contest with me for nothing, so just calling him out on that. This behaviour sure isn't encouraging for me to keep sharing.

    Da Flex

    We _are_ forks, and insignificant to the LibreELEC project. Relax.

    5schatten

    Without trying to get any attention for it? Good one.

    I'm very confused here. You're saying that my solutions weren't solutions because they were in my local tree? If they were obvious fixes, why didn't you come up with them? I'm certainly not the only one capable of doing such things, but the fact remains that I am the one who did put in the work. If you are capable, I don't know. You keep coming to me for solutions to your problems, but when I explain to you what you need to do to find the problem you are unwilling to do it. Can you tell me how you would know that SDL2 was looking for the missing symlink when you don't even know what strace is? In any case, from now on don't even bother asking me. I'm always happy to help people with common interests, but you are the most ungrateful and rude guy I ever came across.

    Again with the version bumping. Congratulations on bumping a package version, you want a medal? Next up, you're PR'ing the libmali issue that I gave you the solution for (after putting in the time and reading code and header files). You certainly didn't think about it, as you were stuck getting SDL2 to work with EGL/KMS, want me to post the messages where I give you the solution? Again, someone else put in the work and you PR without any mention. It's cool, you clearly get off on doing that in some weird way. Give you some sense of accomplishment?

    Sure, I looked at your ppsspp package and copied the patch that you copied from someone else. I think you're getting confused here, I never claimed otherwise. Do you hear voices or something? Which wheel did I claim to reinvent? I said you copied my stuff (which you did) and then you got all triggered for some reason. I've already said I copied from Lakka. If you take a look, you'll see plenty of stuff from me has found it's way to Lakka as well. Which I have no problem with as they did the groundwork. You are welcome to copy anything you want, never said that's a bad thing. Creating PR's with my solutions to problems that I spent a lot of time on without mentioning where you got it from however, is just really bad style. You can claim that it's for the benefit of other users much as u want, but when you skip mentioning where you got it from then you are obviously trying to take credit. Your recent posts in this thread just solidify that.

    Hold your horses there, I'm not the one having a real hard time admitting he copied my stuff. I did indeed borrow and straight up copy a lot of things, you want to tell me where I try taking credit for it?

    Here's you PR'ing what I gave to you without any mention: CMakeList.txt: added symlinks for libGLES_CM.so.1 & libGLESv1_CM.so.1 by 5schatten · Pull Request #4 · LibreELEC/libmali · GitHub

    It's funny that you bring up PCSX2, adding some verbosity to my pcsx2.start script does not change the fact that I'm the one who wrote it in the first place. The relevant part is exactly the same. I put in the time reading Docker documentation, creating containers and experimenting with ALSA and Pulse to see what I needed to pass to the container, here you are acting like you did anything meaningful. Like bumping the Docker version, as if that's rocket scienc3. The real work was done by lrusak back in the day, which I'm very thankful for.

    I could go on and pick apart all the ridiculous claims you are making, but I'm gonna save you the embarassment. It's indeed completely immature, and I have other things to do with my time than "proving" that you copied my stuff which you very clearly did. It's great, take what I have made and improve it any way you can but trying to take credit for it is simply pathetic.