Since there are discussions about picture quality differences and you guys seems to know a lot about this I will ask the question I am still wondering about today: is there a picture quality difference between VAAPI and ffmpeg software decoding of the codecs (HEVC, H264, etc)?
I had both yes and no told to me but in my testing I think software looks better but it's close so it's hard to say. Also, the logic that says that the softwatre ffmpeg decoders are probably constantly fine tuned whereas the hardware decoders from vaapi are static in the gpu leans towards software probably got better with time?
So what's the truth on this?
I know that VAAPI with the DV builds look super nice to me and I am unsure I see a difference compared to software but I can't test software for DV because DV doesn't work in software. I mainly compared HDR10 or SDR.
I also know back in the older days software decoding was always better picture quality but it's not that easy to see anymore. For encoding I see the differences easily and still use cpu software encoding.
Yes I am a purist so I hope DV Master Reference will stay in the builds especially since my mini pc is powerful and only uses about 50% of the rendering engine in master reference.
Last note, I compared the DV picture between my AM6B+ and my mini PC and I think the AM6B+ is a little brighter than the mini pc with CroqueMR's build but I don't know which is right? When I say brighter I mean in all the picture, like more elevated but it's very minor or I imagine it maybe since I need to switch between two inputs to try and compare and there's 2-3 seconds of switch delay. I also think the Highlights are higher on CroqueMR's build which makes everything more popping, again slightly.
If there is a difference, can it be due to the HDMI Full versus Limited setting that you need to put to limited by force in that LibreElec build?
Also, why do we need to put that setting forced to limited so that everything is not overdark? I never had to do that on other LibreElec or CoreElec builds?