Posts by Tos26

hello,

please read this thread, that's solved the issue for me.

So, it works perfectly. Thank you again.

I posted a request on the RPI github here. Please confirm that it's in the right place.

vpeter, you are the best !!!

I try this and I will tell you if it's ok. No matter about the version number, I can live with...

Last question, do you know how escalate this issue to have it fixed definitively in the right source code ?

Bad news !! Does it mean that I'm stuck at version 9.0.0 ?

Is it possible to build a fixed version based on 9.0.2 ?

Hello chewitt, vpeter,

Do you know if the issue described in this thread is now fixed in the 9.0.2 release ?

I would like to update to kodi 18.2 and before that, I want to be sure to not meet again a NTP sync problem...

Thank you.

Hello guys !

I just tested this image and I got the same issue : No NTP sync.

Sorry chewitt.

Ok vpeter, but how can I check when this part will be included in LE?

How did you check that just now?

Hello chewitt, vpeter,

I try to find where is located the workaround provided by vpeter for my issue in the librelec repository and I don't find.

Could you indicate me where is the file(s) modified in the repo in order to check when this issue will be officially solved and when I can switch to an official version ?

In other words, how can I know if this issue is fixed ?

Thank you.

If the date is not updated (NTP sync), the certificate is not validated and some addons don't work.

See this thread.

I hope so too.

Ok chewitt.

I think I can close the discussion.

Thank you again to both of you.

Congratulations guys !!

It works with the bcdc image : Log file

Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {del} route fe80:: gw :: scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {del} route ff00:: gw :: scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} address 192.168.0.19/24 label wlan0 family 2
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 192.168.0.0 gw 0.0.0.0 scope 253 <LINK>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 192.168.0.254 gw 0.0.0.0 scope 253 <LINK>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.27.40.240 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.27.40.241 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 0.0.0.0 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: wlan0 {add} route 212.227.81.55 gw 192.168.0.254 scope 0 <UNIVERSE>
Jun 22 13:11:57 LibreELEC connmand[341]: ntp: adjust (jump): +20939080.231378 sec
Feb 19 20:36:39 LibreELEC nmbd[368]: [2019/02/19 20:36:39.527158,  0] ../lib/util/become_daemon.c:138(daemon_ready)
Feb 19 20:36:39 LibreELEC nmbd[368]:   daemon_ready: STATUS=daemon 'nmbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections

What are the next steps:

1. Open a ticket to Libreelec : Who is in charge of this ? (No issue request on github)
2. My personal case : can I use this test image "in production" at home? Is it based on the 9.0.0 official version ?

Thank you for your support and your availability, it was a pleasure to work with you...

I test right now the bcdc...

And does it mean that you want the test like that:

    wget -O ntpd_tos_00 http://vpeter.libreelec.tv/tmp/ntpd_tos_00
    chmod +x ntpd_tos_00
    ./ntpd_tos_00 -d -d -d -n -p pool.ntp.org

Yeah ! I didn't see your recent reply.

So I have to test the BCDC image ?

Hello,

I tested the new image you generated vpeter and unfortunately, there is the same issue

The verbose log file

We can see the ToS config taken into account here:

Jun 22 13:11:52 LibreELEC systemd[1]: Starting Iptables set TOS for NTP...

And the result of tcpdump : http://ix.io/1bvv

ToS is set well to 0x0.

Some ideas ?

chewitt: I will see the links you gave.

Hello vpeter,

I am at work now, I will try this evening.

Thank you.

So, I have the same issue with my second PI3

Effectively, it's a good thing to test. I will test with my other PI3 (not a B+) just to see if there is the same issue.

You say that it's impossible to test with ToS = 0 without to build a dedicated image?