Plan A: afl1's current work forward-ports the legacy Amlogic/Android dvb approach using the kernel backporting technique (media_build). It works but some people (not me, but kernel maintainers whose opinions count) consider this approach to be inappropriate as the legacy Android approach does not follow kernel standards. It's not impossible for afl1 to adapt his code, but this will take some time and effort and will require persistence and a willingness to accept feedback. So far he has only submitted one small fragment of code to a kernel mailing list. That was back in January and the maintainers made comments which received zero response. If he has any interest in seeing his work upstreamed (and sending the patch would indicate that he does, or did) communications will need to improve. If afl1 needs help with the upstreaming or communications there are numerous people who would like to assist. All he needs to do is ask for help.
Plan B: There are also funded commercial projects in the Amlogic ecosystem with requirements for mainline kernel DVB support so even if afl1 shows no further interest in sending code upstream; at some point a professional developer will be tasked to write and then upstream something that meets the required standards. This will not happen quickly as there are many code packages in those commercial projects with a higher-priority, but eventually it will be the top item on someone's to-do list and I am confident that it will be done.
I'd personally like to see the work done by afl1 be adapted and absorbed for the benefit of all, but I also see dvb support as a minor feature. Our overall experience as a project shows that the majority of users prefer USB tuners or independent network-based tuner devices as they are client-device agnostic, usually deliver better results, and are better long-term investments.