/storage/.kodi/addons.
Posts by vpeter
-
-
Seems at least libbluray 1.1.2 is needed for this? Currently 1.0.2 is used.
-
At least video playback should be hw decoded.
-
Ok, then I will stick with OpenJDK.
Seems when playing with BD menus video playing behaves differently.
This fast-forward and fast-backward issue I already noticed. I'm talking with one guy who knows this area little better and he told me that according to Blu-ray specs, players should always support rate 2 (double speed). Higher speeds can also be supported, but isn't required. Not sure why this doesn't work in Kodi.
On "the other forum" user also reported that video was software decoded. When playing without menus they are decoded in hw. Not sure why.
Maybe The team could ask about this issues Kodi devs.
-
Try to remove this zulu version (which is based on OpenJDK) and install program.java-9.0.101-generic.x86_64.zip with Oracle JRE.
Compare if works better. I don't have much experience except that I see menus

I'm thinking to push the addon to official repo because now I have everything build from sources (except JDK/JRE).
-
So I tried it on Wetek Play 1 and BD-J menus works. Just like on RPi.
-
So I found one small ISO (UkkosJourney-BluPlay.iso ~80MB) and BD-J menus are still working on x64 device.
In next few weeks I will try on Amlogic device.
-
-
If I remember correctly there are some unknown issues with LibreELEC build server when building libretro.scummvm.
-
For server you have minidlna addon in LibreELEC repository.
-
Many host name more 100+ or 1000+ but it 1 link php instance.
So what? Use copy/paste if you don't want to type.
100+ services is not pirate. 1000+ ..... probably

-
Create M3U8 playlist with your channels and import this list to tvheadend?
-
p.s. I'm not interested in communicating with you.

Me neither. But it is so fun reading your posts

Some of the users (who are not familiar with the communication style of CE apologists) may have believed it ....

And you were the first one
OMG! -
You again give inaccurate information (you have previously tried to intentionally spread fakes about N2, after that I am skeptical about your information). As far as I know, the representative of Beelinc offered CE sample KING, but CE representatives said they need a lot of samples for all developers. This requirement is very similar to the attempt to put obviously impossible requirement that would then hide behind this, why they were not able to release the CE image for King.
..............when used in normal mode (when the radiator is looking down), its efficiency is about 40%.
"intentionally spread fakes": Where and what exactly? I only pointed to your (wrong) speculations.
Company makes big profit from other people's work and they can't send few samples? Only one! If they are serious they should send few samples. And not "lot of samples"

Update: It is alive
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.How did you calculated or measure exactly 40%? So others can repeat the tests.
-
Perhaps for this reason CE do not want to engage in Beelink King (s922).
If you can't read on CE forum what is the reason to not support this device (yet) with "old" kernel it is your fault. If you don't understand ask someone to translate the reason to your language.
-
Does this mean that those applications don't have support for ipv6?
Probably. You can check that in source code. Or maybe ipv6 is disabled on start and only ipv4 is used.
-
No, it was not me who implemented fw in le.
You can open a ticket here if you want: Ticket System - LibreELEC Forum
-